Brazil have confirmed Neymar's inclusion in the 2026 tournament squad, and we think it is the most consequential selection gamble of this entire World Cup cycle. Not because Neymar is finished, but because the evidence strongly suggests Brazil lack the creative depth to absorb another Neymar breakdown, and the history here is not kind.
The fitness concern is not new, and that is the problem
Neymar's inclusion was confirmed despite documented doubts over his fitness following a recent injury layoff. Ancelotti's decision to select him signals a clear prioritisation of experience and star power over guaranteed availability. On one level, that is understandable. Neymar, when fit, remains one of the most creative attacking players in the Brazilian system, capable of unlocking defences that would otherwise sit in two compact defensive banks against the Seleção.
But the pattern of reliance on Neymar has been tested before, and Brazil paid for it. At the 2022 World Cup, Brazil's squad was similarly constructed around an ageing Neymar carrying the creative burden. When a knee injury removed him from the quarter-final against Croatia, Brazil's attack lost the coherence it needed in the cruelest possible moment. They were eliminated on penalties, and the tactical dependency on one player was brutally exposed. That tournament did not feel like a lesson learned. This selection suggests it was not.
The current injury concern is not a one-off. Neymar's 2025-26 season has been referenced as a period of consistent fitness worry, and selecting a player with that kind of recent history for a tournament that demands peak physical output across seven high-intensity matches over five weeks is a structural risk, not a calculated one.
Roger Ibanez and the depth problem beyond Neymar
The wider squad picture adds another layer of concern. The emotional reaction from Roger Ibanez upon receiving his call-up, widely noted and circulated, is a signal worth examining. Ibanez is not a frontline creative attacker, but the emotion around his inclusion points to a squad where the depth outside the established names is thinner than Brazil would want heading into a home-continent tournament. When fringe inclusions generate that kind of reaction, it reflects a selection pool where competition for places is not as fierce as the country's footballing reputation would suggest.
Brazil's attacking options beyond Neymar have genuine quality, particularly through Vinicius Jr., who carries the weight of Real Madrid's forward line week in, week out. But Vinicius operates best when he has a creative foil working centrally, someone capable of drawing defenders and threading passes into the channels he exploits. Without Neymar, that dynamic shifts. The burden on Vinicius becomes heavier, and Brazil's attack becomes more predictable, more reliant on individual brilliance rather than collective structure.
What Ancelotti gets right, and where his argument falls short
The strongest counter-argument to our position is Ancelotti himself. His track record managing elite, ageing, and injury-prone players at the highest level is genuinely exceptional. At Real Madrid, he built squad environments where load management and psychological handling of star players became a competitive advantage. The argument runs that Ancelotti knows exactly how to protect Neymar through the group stage, manage his minutes carefully, and bring him to peak condition for the knockout rounds. His tactical system, built on positional flexibility and collective pressing, does not demand that one player carry the creative load alone.
That argument has real merit, and we are not dismissing it. Ancelotti is one of the finest man-managers in the history of club football, and his ability to handle complex squad dynamics is not in doubt. But there is a structural difference between club football and a World Cup. At club level, a manager has fifty or sixty matches across a season to manage load across a squad, rotate, rest, and reintroduce. At a World Cup, the group stage offers three matches, with knockout football immediately following. If Neymar picks up a knock in the round of sixteen, Ancelotti cannot rotate him out for two weeks and bring him back fresh. The tournament ends or advances without him, and Brazil needs a plan for that scenario that currently looks underprepared.
Ancelotti's tactical system is adaptable, and that is a genuine mitigating factor. But adaptability requires depth, and the Ibanez signal suggests that depth, particularly in the attacking third, is a concern.
The 2026 tournament demands tournament-ready squads
The expanded 48-team format for the 2026 tournament means the road to the final is longer than any previous World Cup. More matches, more physical attrition, more exposure to injury risk. The nations that succeed in this format will be those with genuine squad depth across all positions, not those who arrive banking on a single player staying fit across a gruelling six or seven-game run.
Brazil, with Neymar fit and firing, are genuine title contenders. Their attacking trio with Vinicius and a fully fit Neymar would be among the most dangerous in the tournament. But the 2022 lesson taught us that tournament football is unforgiving when your creative spine is a single player with a history of breaking down at major tournaments.
Our verdict
We think Ancelotti is a good enough manager to maximise whatever Neymar gives him, and we would never argue against including a player of his quality in a squad on principle. But the selection logic here has a flaw that experience alone cannot close: Brazil do not have an adequate creative replacement if Neymar's body fails him again. The 2026 tournament will punish that gap if it is exposed, and we have seen enough evidence across two World Cup cycles to know that with Neymar, the risk is real. Brazil are not favourites because they selected Neymar. Brazil would be genuine favourites if Neymar were a certainty to last the tournament, and he is not.
This article was researched and drafted with AI assistance and reviewed by our editorial team.
